Skip to main content

Table 4 Analysis of influential factors on the clinical thinking ability in the PBL group

From: The impact of an integrated PBL curriculum on clinical thinking in undergraduate medical students prior to clinical practice

Item

n

Scores (mean ± SD)

t or F value

P

Gender

    

 Male

63

74.34 ± 14.00

-0.336

0.715

 Female

64

73.51 ± 11.23

  

Birthplace

    

 City

74

66.38 ± 9.15

-1.11

0.269

 Countryside

53

64.55 ± 9.20

  

Frequency of reading literature

    

 More than 4 articles per week

13

78.75 ± 14.36

15.811

0.000

 2–3 articles per week

58

79.01 ± 10.90

  

 Less than 1 article per week

56

67.53 ± 11.11

  

Time of PBL self-directed learning

    

 More than 6 h per week

18

80.34 ± 13.45

3.498

0.018

 4–6 h per week

39

74.41 ± 11.86

  

 2–4 h per week

48

73.93 ± 12.52

  

 Less than 2 h per week

22

67.78 ± 11.43

  

PBL performance scores ranking

    

 Top 30%

42

75.37 ± 12.84

3.998

0.021

 Between top 30% and last 10%

68

74.99 ± 12.24

  

 Last 10%

17

66.05 ± 11.44